All Calories Are Not Created Equal

I saw a commercial for 100 Calorie Oreo Cakesters this morning, and I just had to laugh. Am I the only one who thinks the whole 100-calorie pack trend is out of control? Not only are the packs a rip-off (containing 5-6 servings for typically a higher cost than their non-individually-packaged counterparts), but most of them are nutritional wastelands. Just because it has 100 calories doesn’t mean it’s good for you. 100 calories of Cheetos is still Cheetos! The 100-calorie packs are a prime example of how diet foods are not always the best choice. Sure, you’re only consuming 100 calories (IF you only eat one package, and let’s face it, people will often eat more than one at a time), but what benefit do those 100 calories have for your body? Very little, in most cases! Replacing a higher-calorie, nutrient-poor food (like an Oreo) with a lower-calorie, nutrient-poor food (like a 100 calorie Oreo Cakester) is a pitiful trade-off, if you ask me. Sure, you can eat a package of sugar free Oreos or some SnackWells cookies for minimal calories, but wouldn’t it be better to just eat an apple? Eating an apple with a tablespoon of peanut butter is one of my favorite snacks, and not only is that snack relatively low in calories, it has nutritional benefits, including fiber and protein.

I think one of the reasons the 100-calorie packs have been so wildly popular is because of their built-in portion control. Many people eat mindlessly, sitting in front of the TV with an open bag of chips or cookies, and it’s very easy to eat 2-3 (or even 4-5) servings in one sitting if you’re not paying attention. (Believe me, I speak from personal experience.) For these people, the snack packs are a blessing and a way to keep from overeating. But the thing is, people could easily talk themselves into eating more than one pack at a time because they’re only 100 calories after all (and usually the servings are disappointingly small), and before they know it, they’ve probably eaten way more than they needed (again, personal experience talking here).

The snack packs also allow people to indulge their sweet tooth without consuming a ton of calories, which admittedly is a good thing, but I also think it’s far too tempting to rely on the snacks as a daily food source rather than an occasional treat. Even eating lower calorie diet foods daily can have a negative effect, if those foods are taking the place of ones that provide your body with the nutrients and energy it needs to function at its highest level. I don’t avoid all sweets; quite the contrary in fact. But if I am going to indulge, I eat one piece of a Dove chocolate or have some Jell-O Sugar Free dark chocolate pudding, which has 3 grams of fiber and is only 60 calories. You can still make occasional sweets a part of a healthy lifestyle.

From a financial standpoint, it makes more sense to just buy the “regular” version of some of these snacks and portion them out yourself, using plastic baggies or tupperware containers. From a nutritional standpoint, it makes more sense to bypass most of those foods altogether and choose foods that are low in calories and high in fiber and protein.

Some of my favorite snacks: almonds, grapes, carrots with a little ranch dressing, apples with peanut butter, whole wheat toast with peanut butter, tangerines.

Do you buy any 100-calorie packs? What healthy snacks are your favorites?

8 thoughts on “All Calories Are Not Created Equal

  1. I just blogged a wonderful recipe – come check out my egg omelete and brown rice at my health blog. Here are two of my favorite snacks: 1/2 cup of Vanilla low fat yogart 1/2 cup of blueberries sprinkly just a taste of granola*******************Apples…. dipped in natural organic peanut butter!!!!


  2. Okay, I have to admit- I bought some of thsoe 100 calorie packs a while, but it was to take on an airplane to the Middle East. In fact, I packed a lot of snacks (not all 100 calorie packs) because airport food is often a) gross and b) absurdly expensive. Have you also thought about the waste in terms of trash with all those 100 calorie pack bags and boxes floating around out there? Whatever happened to going green? And really, if you want the Oreo “taste,” you must eat an Oreo, not some chocolate graham cracker thing…otherwise, you should just buy chocolate graham crackers. Which I actually recommend.


  3. So I have to tell you how inspiring you are to me! I’m so proud of you for changing your life. I’m on the way and hope to see the scale start with a 1 someday soon. Keep it up, Erin. :o)


  4. Jenny, I think they’re perfectly okay as an occasional kind of thing, and sometimes they’re even very convenient (like on long plane flights!). I agree about chocolate graham crackers; I haven’t had any in a while, but that may just have to be a new snack when I go grocery shopping next month!


  5. Im finally down to ONLY buying the 100calorie almond packs.down from buying everything from chex mix to milano 100 cal was a HUGE LIGHTBULB MOMENT for me when I realized that 100 calories does not equal 100 calories.truly.


  6. We buy a lot of the 100 calorie packs if only because on Weight Watchers it’s easy to calculate points. Got the munchies? Have a 100-cal pack of Sun Chips, chalk it up to 2 points and keep going!


Tell me your thoughts! I'd love to read them.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s